Norway’s Border with Russia Under Surveillance Draws Hikers

At the extreme northeast of Norway, trails allow walkers to approach the Russian border as closely as possible. But behind the landscapes of boreal forests and tundra, hikers discover a territory where cameras, lookout posts, and military patrols remind how sensitive the place is. For several years now, this 198-kilometer border has drawn more visitors, notably cruise ship passengers. A tourist curiosity that takes on a very particular dimension here.

A border turned into a tourist attraction

In Kirkenes, a small town near the meeting point of Norway, Finland, and Russia, the border has become one of the curiosities offered to travelers. Several operators run guided walking excursions in the area, notably along the Pasvik River. One route lasts about three hours and leads to Russehøgda, a summit overlooking the Storskog border post, the only land crossing allowed between the two countries.

The hike first passes through a birch and conifer forest before reaching a cleared forest belt eight meters wide. This strip marks the border area and visitors are not allowed to venture into it. Yellow boundary posts on the Norwegian side and red ones on the Russian side mark the international boundary.

Security has tightened since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Visitors may notice cameras installed in trees, observation posts, and military patrols. Some rules are particularly strict: it is notably forbidden to photograph soldiers, to touch or climb the border posts, or to throw objects toward Russia. Hikers must also carry their passports with them.

For Henrik Hoffmann, a guide stationed in Kirkenes since 2021, this particular atmosphere is part of what makes the excursion appealing. “Many older travelers are especially interested because they remember the Cold War and have followed the relations between Europe and Russia for decades,” he told the BBC. According to him, the hike also helps visitors grasp concretely what it means to live near this border.

The interest of visitors, in fact, has grown in recent years, after an initial decline in tourism following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Havila Voyages has offered excursions in this region since 2000, while Hurtigruten also organizes a border visit, which includes, among other things, a World War II-era anti-aircraft shelter.

In the Footsteps of a Turbulent History

Yet this border is not limited to its present surveillance measures. Across the Kirkenes region, traces of a long-shared history among Norwegians, Finns, and Russians remain visible.

In the town, some streets indeed bear signs in both Norwegian and Russian. A monument also commemorates the liberation of Kirkenes by the Red Army in 1944, after the Nazi occupation. At the Borderland Museum, visitors can discover the relations that have shaped this border region over generations.

Further on, the Pasvik River winds a sinuous course before skirting the Boris Gleb Orthodox Church. Dating from the 12th century, the building played a role in defining the modern border, established about two centuries ago.

From the heights of Russehøgda, the contrast is striking. Tundra and forests spread around the hiker, while the facilities of the Storskog post appear in the distance. A few vehicles continue to cross the border daily, even if recreational crossings have diminished.

And despite the increasing crowd of visitors, fewer locals seem to take these paths. “You don’t see many Norwegians here,” notes Henrik Hoffmann, before suggesting that this might be a classic case of a population that explores less of its own surroundings.

The hike therefore offers much more than a stroll through Arctic landscapes. Just meters from the posts that separate Norway and Russia, the scenery constantly reminds us that this part of Europe is also a space where history and geopolitical tensions remain very concretely visible.

Border Control: Twin Sisters Misidentified by the New European Biometric System (EES)

It’s a mistake that should never have happened. On April 10, 2026, the European EES and ETIAS systems were deployed at airports to improve the management of the external borders of the Schengen area by automating travelers’ identity checks, making them more reliable and efficient. For reference, the EES (Entry Exit System) concerns all nationals of non-member EU countries or those associated with the Schengen area who undertake short stays (up to 90 days within a 180-day period) on the territory of a Schengen member state.

However, since its implementation, this new device has already caused numerous difficulties for travelers, notably long queues. The reasons include airports not yet sufficiently equipped to accommodate this system, as well as several technical malfunctions. The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, recently admitted that it suffers from “unresolved technical problems and requires a lot of work”.

These are not the only problems since the deployment of this new system. In May, a British national attempting to join the United Kingdom from Cluj-Napoca, Romania, was accused of illegal stay in the Schengen area. The authorities reproached her for not properly recording her departure after a previous stay in Amsterdam, in April 2026. The problem? It was not she who had gone there, but her twin sister.

The system duped by the similarity of the two facial scans

Following this, the young woman was interrogated for about fifteen minutes by border officers. When she explained that she had a twin sister, they initially suspected that she had lent her passport to her sister, which was false. Her sister was in the United Kingdom at the time of the events and had never set foot in Romania. She was ultimately allowed to take the plane, but remains concerned about her future travels.

The EES confused the two women due to the similarity of their facial scans, but perhaps also because of their surnames, dates of birth, and nationalities, which constitute the only common points detected by the system. Conversely, their fingerprints, first names, and passports are different.

According to Niovi Vavoula, a lecturer in cyberpolicy at the University of Luxembourg, this unusual situation could be explained by a misrecorded departure for her twin sister during her Amsterdam stay, but also by insufficient checks by the Romanian authorities in Cluj. “This type of incident is very common and is corroborated by many testimonies”, she told the POLITICO media outlet.

The authorities pointed at after this malfunction

The traveler’s interrogation would also have suggested that “the Romanian authorities did not do their job properly”. “According to the briefing you sent me, it seems the authorities are not sufficiently trained to distinguish between the different processes and rely on facial images as the sole identification method”, Niovi Vavoula told the media outlet POLITICO.

She then added: “the fact that they did not verify passport information in the EES, nor take into account that the EES is still new and that it contains various problems, illustrates what is known as anchoring bias, which is the tendency to rely on the first piece of evidence and neglect the rest”. On the European Commission’s side, a spokesperson said that the Commission “does not comment on individual cases.” He did, however, specify that “Member States are responsible for the data recorded in the EES, to which the Commission has no access”.

He concluded by recalling that “if a traveler is concerned about how their data is handled, they have the right to request the rectification and augmentation of their personal data. In such a case, they can contact the competent authorities of the Member State, either at the border or by directly reaching out to those authorities”.