How River Cruises Adapt to Dry Rivers


Le Danube est tombé cet été à son plus bas niveau jamais enregistré - DepositPhotos.com, Mario Kprn

Hurtigruten


The drought affecting parts of Europe has seriously complicated this summer’s river tourism season.

From the Danube to the Rhine, via the Main and several French canals, low water levels are making certain stretches difficult, even impossible, to navigate.

Nevertheless, cruise operators are avoiding cancellations as much as possible. They have developed a whole range of solutions: changing boats, reversing itineraries, relocating port calls, overnight stays in hotels, or coach transfers.

An adaptability that allows departures to be saved, but which can also significantly alter the trip purchased by the client.


VNF : the small-draft network far more affected

In France, Voies navigables de France (VNF) wants to avoid generalizations.

In a note published on August 13, the institution notes that 97.5% of the large-draft network remains operational despite the drought.

The situation is markedly different on the small-draft network, particularly important for river tourism : only 71.5% of the network remains operational.

This difference directly concerns pleasure boating, the rental of boats without a license, or some houseboats-hotels.

The situation deteriorated over the summer. By August 15, the reservoir-dams monitored by VNF displayed an average fill rate of 35%, versus 42% at the start of the month and 58% on average over the last ten years on the same date.

The Canal de Bourgogne and the Canal latéral à la Loire were notably closed to navigation as part of restrictions affecting North-South connections. Other incidents were reported on the canal between Champagne and Bourgogne, the Yonne, the Seille or the Ardennes Canal.

Asked, Riverly told us they do not wish to speak on this subject.


The “ship swap” technique

The French difficulties are part of a much broader phenomenon.

AmaWaterways describes a summer “exceptionally dry” in Europe. According to the company, the Danube in Romania fell to its lowest level in around thirty years, while the Rhine, the Main and the upper Danube are operating below seasonal levels.

When certain thresholds are crossed, ships can no longer navigate safely.

Viking has also confirmed exceptionally low levels on parts of the Rhine and Danube and warned that several of its itineraries may be modified.

To avoid cancellations, operators have developed a now well-honed technique: the “ship swap”.

AmaWaterways positions two ships on the same river, on opposite sides of the now-inaccessible sector. During a land excursion, passengers move from one vessel to the other. On arrival, their luggage awaits them in a corresponding cabin. The impassable stretch is thus bypassed without interrupting the voyage.

Viking applies a comparable strategy thanks to identical sister ships navigating in opposite directions. Passengers can switch ships while retaining the same cabin category on the other side of the affected zone.

This arrangement, however, requires a sufficiently large fleet and ships positioned in the right place.


AmaWaterways claims zero cancellations

When changing ships isn’t enough, operators go further.

AmaWaterways explains it can reverse the direction of a cruise, add a night in a city, arrange a coach journey to an inaccessible port of call, or even rebuild the itinerary entirely.

The company thus claims to have not cancelled any departure this summer due to the low water levels.

Rather than dropping a trip when the river becomes impracticable, the aim is to preserve as much of the touring program around the navigation as possible, even if it means completing part of the journey by road.


When the cruise continues on the road

In Budapest, some boats had to stop at Komárom, about 120 kilometers from the Hungarian capital, forcing their passengers to continue by road.

In Bulgaria, near Vidin, 186 tourists had to be evacuated from a vessel that had run aground.

In Spain, El País reported the case of 120 travelers who set out on a Danube cruise. Facing navigation difficulties, a large portion of the itinerary had to be completed by road. The passengers estimated they would cover nearly 1,500 kilometers by coach.


Tourism in the Face of Climate Change: Adapt or Endure? [ABO]


Tourisme : des destinations best sellers seront invivables... - crédit photo : visuel généré à l'aide de l'IA

CroisiEurope


In 2014, to raise awareness about climate change, TF1 attempted a projection exercise during a weather bulletin.

We are August 17, 2050. France is smothered under an oppressive sun, barely veiled.

“Tomorrow morning, temperatures will already be very high, notably in Paris, Perpignan or Nice, with 26 degrees. In the afternoon, we will reach or exceed 40°C: 41 in Strasbourg, 40 in the capital, 42 in Lyon and up to 43 degrees forecast in Nîmes,” announced Evelyne Dhéliat, during a weather bulletin aired after the evening news.

Science fiction? Not at all. Just twelve years earlier, one could see that there was no need to project so far. These temperatures, which used to belong to forecasting, have become reality, even before summer has begun.

As economist Maxime Combes notes, Evelyne Dhéliat made three errors in her forecasts: no, Brittany and the Cotentin will not be spared; no, you won’t have to wait until August to burn on the spot; and no, you shouldn’t wait until 2050 either.

Indeed, by the end of 2026, France is already beating records one after another. It had already reached 37.8 °C at La Couronne in Charente, 37.4 °C in Perpignan and 37.6 °C in Narbonne.

While travel agencies struggle, France burns. And some still prefer to avert their eyes, when they don’t choose to laugh.



Tourism: Best-Selling Destinations Will Become Unlivable…

On his side, Daniel Riolo, a journalist whose humor is increasingly lacking, urged the French to stop “whining“, while asserting “it’s hot, enough already!

A few hours later, in a classroom in Soustons, in the Landes, the thermometer surged and reached 53 degrees.

We are at the end of May, the students are suffocating, but all it will take is to slip on a T-shirt and open the windows. Seriously? Two very bad pieces of advice in such a situation.

Let us be clear: our industry cannot avoid a reflection on its future, even as crises follow one another, whether for travel agencies or for institutional actors.

To read: Greenhouse gas emissions: tourism must (quickly) act or die?

Because if we do nothing, an entire swath of destinations marketed by distribution, but also countries heavily dependent on tourism, will become unvisitable during the summer period.

If we do nothing, the South and the Mediterranean basin will be regions comparable to the desert of Africa. In short, this region will no longer be attractive for summer vacations. The sand will be so hot that no one will be able to walk there.

Tourists will not want to stay in their hotel room all day, when there are other places to go out.

If we do nothing, I am not optimistic for this region
“, explained a few years ago Wouter Vanneuville, climate adaptation expert at the European Environment Agency.

The clock is ticking. And even if adaptation in Europe is very costly, doing nothing will cost more, economically and in human terms.


… infrastructures will become obsolete

This episode of historical precocity reminds us that destinations are not the only things that are not adapted: our infrastructures are not in a better position.

Last week, SNCF had no choice but to cancel trains.

The carrier explained that this decision was necessary due to the risk of air conditioning failures, because equipment is too old and not robust enough to withstand extreme temperatures.

At the last EDV conference, Jean Castex, the former prime minister, underscored the urgency of the situation.

I often say that climate-skeptics would be stunned by the evolution observed in just 15 years if they visited the SNCF.

This impact is now considerable. The consequences are not limited to more pronounced climatic phenomena.



We are particularly witnessing a rise in forest fires. Yet, our lines traverse numerous wooded areas, which can have a very significant impact on rail traffic.

There is also a disruption of wildlife and a sharp increase in trees falling onto the network. In ten years, they have multiplied by fourteen“, confided the CEO of SNCF.

The carrier also keeps a close watch on problems with catenaries, power supply, or the overheating of rails. When it is 37 °C, the temperature of the rail can reach 55 °C. At that level, it can warp.

In 2025 already, the new Nantes station had to be closed due to the heat. It has again made headlines last week.

Air travel will not be spared either.


Tourism is not the climate’s arch-enemy, but it must question itself!

In 2017, the city of Phoenix, United States, turned into a true furnace. The thermometer exceeded 50 degrees.

The hotter the air, the less dense it is. Therefore, one must reach a higher takeoff speed. The length of the runway can be a determining factor in achieving that speed. In Phoenix, with this heat wave, air density made takeoffs impossible“, explained Clément Mallet, project manager for mobility and adaptation at Carbone 4, in a previous article.

Global warming will also intensify turbulence.

According to a study by researchers at the University of Reading, these phenomena are becoming more frequent due to warmer air. Today, on a Paris–New York flight, passengers experience an average of 10 minutes of turbulence.

By 2050, that will be more like 20 to 30 minutes.

Here are as many examples as there are to show that our industry is not ready to face this phenomenon that we, humanity, have created. And we have not even spoken about rising sea levels or the dwindling of snow in the mountains… nor about the regulatory risk that could be imposed on companies…

Good news, we still have our fate in our own hands.

And contrary to what a recently posted LinkedIn message by a captain suggested, it is clear that taxing French aviation will not change everything. But it is not either by shifting blame onto others or by minimizing one’s own impact on global warming that we will advance the debate.

With such reasoning, we could have allowed people to keep smoking in restaurants, bars or cafes. After all, one cigarette cannot hurt anyone. Likewise, it would be easier to avoid picking up after Fido’s poop or to refrain from throwing a bottle in the trash…

Of course, it is the sum of individual behaviors that is at stake. Only a broad, global awareness will keep our old Earth breathable.

So no, we should not stop traveling, nor flying. But we must all, collectively, adopt a reasoned behavior, so that this industry remains the powerful lever of emancipation and inclusion, whether in 2050 or beyond.