CDG Airport Expansion: NGOs Urge Government to Rethink Tourism Strategy


Trois ONG contestent le projet d’extension - Depositphotos.com @boscorelli

CroisiEurope


The extension project for Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport is drawing fresh criticism. On July 30, 2026, the State and Groupe ADP announced an agreement for investments totaling €8.3 billion between 2027 and 2034, of which €6 billion is allocated to Paris-CDG.

This program constitutes the first phase of a redevelopment project planned through 2050. Three NGOs – Transport & Environment (T&E), Réseau Action Climat (RAC) and Rester sur Terre – are now urging the government to abandon it.

The project is intended to gradually increase the airport’s capacity. By 2050, ADP foresees 19% more aircraft movements and 38% more passengers compared with 2019, i.e. about 29 million additional passengers.

The first phase of works could enable hosting an additional 14 million passengers per year starting in 2035.

The program notably foresees more aircraft stands for large and medium-capacity aircraft, while some stands for small-capacity aircraft will be removed. This evolution is intended to accompany the development of long-haul routes.

For T&E, however, this increase in capacity runs counter to France’s emissions reduction trajectory.


A Significant Gap with SNBC Objectives

According to a new analysis by T&E, the CO₂ emissions tied to Paris-CDG’s activity could exceed 6 million tonnes per year by 2050 with the extension project.

The association estimates that this level would be 28% higher than in a scenario without the extension.

T&E compares these projections to the goals of the third National Low-Carbon Strategy (SNBC 3). This strategy provides for an indicative budget of 3 million tonnes of CO₂ for international travel by 2050, of which about 2.4 million tonnes would come from aviation.

Paris-CDG accounts for a little more than half of aviation emissions; T&E estimates that its emissions level should not exceed about 1.3 million tonnes of CO₂ per year by that date.

The High Council for Climate also noted, in its opinion on SNBC 3, that the substantial biomass needs required for sustainable aviation fuel production argued for stabilizing the sector rather than building new airport infrastructure.


NGOs Question the Tourism Relevance of the Extension

Beyond the climate issue, the Réseau Action Climat (RAC) highlights the tourist flows generated by French airports.

According to data cited by the organization, 62% of air traffic corresponds to French people traveling abroad, versus 38% for foreign tourists arriving in France. Between 2024 and 2025, emitter traffic would have risen by 4.1% while receptor traffic grew by 3%.

For RAC, an increase in air capacity does not guarantee an improvement in France’s tourism balance. The risk would be to boost departures to destinations such as Southern Europe, the Maghreb, Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, or Oceania, where traffic is largely associated with French travelers leaving the country.

The associations therefore advocate a different approach to tourism policy.


Focusing More on Domestic Tourism and Europe

The RAC suggests promoting holidays for French residents within France and strengthening the welcome of foreign visitors from nearby destinations.

The development of rail connections between France and other European countries is presented as a lever to increase international arrivals while reducing dependence on air transport.

The NGOs also warn about the concentration of tourism benefits in a few highly visited areas, as well as the tensions this concentration can cause on landuse and housing access for local populations.


T&E Calls for Limiting Air Traffic

For T&E, the decarbonization of aviation cannot rely solely on alternative fuels and technological progress.

The organization therefore asks the government to freeze airport extension projects and cap the number of flights, targeting in particular segments it considers to have the lowest social value, such as private jets, certain long-haul tourist flights, and low-cost connections.

Transport & Environment, Réseau Action Climat, and Rester sur Terre thus ask the government to renounce the Paris-CDG extension project and to rethink its tourism strategy in favor of the domestic market and nearby European clientele.

This stance comes five years after the government abandoned the Roissy Terminal 4 project in 2021.


IFTM: Could the trade show also be an opportunity to rethink your career?


Transition professionnelle : un salon comme l’IFTM peut devenir un révélateur, car on y retrouve son marché mais aussi une partie de soi - Depositphotos.com, rclassenlayouts

CroisiEurope


The IFTM will once again gather those who shape tourism, from September 15 to 17.

For three days, badges will cross in the aisles, appointments will follow one another, business cards will be exchanged, and conversations will sometimes extend well beyond the official salon hours.

Because a B2B show is primarily a place for business. People come here to meet clients, partners, discover markets, discuss innovation or prepare for the months ahead.

But there is also something more subtle at play.

You will reconnect with former colleagues and you will cross executives you have known for a long time. You discover that someone has changed companies, that someone else has created their own activity, or that another has just taken on a new responsibility. You then measure the evolutions of a sector, sometimes without even realizing it.

And within this collective movement, a personal question sometimes makes its way.

And it is not necessarily because one is looking for a job, but sometimes simply because one senses that something must evolve.

After a few years in the same company or after a reorganization, a departure, or simply the desire to give one’s career a different direction, a show like the IFTM can become a revealer, because you find your market but also a part of yourself.



Passing from a search-oriented mindset to a positioning-oriented mindset

This is particularly true for executives, because when an executive leaves their post, voluntarily or not, the temptation is strong to want to very quickly find a comparable situation (same level of responsibility, equivalent scope, same title).

One must “bounce back.” And if possible, quickly.

Yet, the real challenge of a professional transition often lies elsewhere. It is not only about finding a job. It is about finding a direction again.

After ten, fifteen, or twenty years of a career, a manager never starts from scratch. They depart with solid experience, know-how, an understanding of organizations, but also a more precise awareness of what they no longer want. Their professional capital has evolved.

The problem is that we often keep presenting ourselves by our last job title. We have been HR directors, sales directors, marketing directors. We have held certain roles in certain companies and, when that tenure ends, we naturally seek to reclaim its equivalent.

However, a career path is not reducible to a job title.

Behind a post lie skills, experiences, problems solved, transformations supported, environments in which one has learned to be effective. It is precisely this process of putting things into perspective that enables moving from a search logic to a positioning logic.


A professional show can be valuable during a period of transition

In a period of professional transition, the reflex is often to multiply approaches. As if volume would automatically generate more opportunities (more resumes, more applications, more contacts).

Yet, by trying not to close any doors too many, one can end up not being clearly identified behind any door.

A professional who presents themselves as “open to any opportunity” signals availability but does not necessarily give a precise reason to consider them.

Conversely, the one who can explain what they bring, in which contexts their experience is particularly useful, and what they now wish to build becomes much more legible.

The market does not necessarily notice those who can do everything. It notices those whose value is identifiable.

That is also why a professional show can be valuable during a period of transition. Not to distribute their CV there, nor even to find a job there, but to listen attentively. Observe sector transformations. Understand leaders’ concerns. Hear new needs. See new ways of working emerge.


Being able to talk about one’s experience

There is a substantial difference between saying “I’m looking for a position” and being able to talk about one’s experience, its professional convictions, and what one would like to contribute in the future.

In the first case, you are seeking an opportunity. In the second, you open a conversation.

And it is often in these conversations that trajectories one had not imagined arise. It could be a mission, a consulting activity, an entrepreneurial project, a meeting that leads to another meeting or simply a discussion that helps understand that a skill acquired over the years can have value in a very different context.

In this perspective, the network is no longer a mere list of people to call when one needs a job. It is a professional ecosystem that one nourishes over time.

A show like the IFTM is one of those places where this ecosystem meets in person.

The field shows that career paths are not as linear as one might imagine. That some professionals switch sectors, that others leave salaried jobs, that some accept a role less obvious on paper and find new momentum there.

Perhaps that is, ultimately, the true interest of a rendezvous like the IFTM for a professional in reflection: to rethink what comes next.