How to Avoid Travel Scams: Fake Guides and Pushy Vendors

On vacation, some hiccups are hard to avoid: a pushy vendor, a so-called guide who corners you in the street, or a fellow traveler who watches a movie without headphones. To prevent these encounters from spoiling an entire day, it’s better to know how to respond. After twenty-five years roaming the world as a travel journalist, Rob Crossan explains in The Daily Mail that he has developed a few techniques to keep nuisance at bay. The common thread among all these situations is simple: avoid confrontation and know who to pass the baton to.

On the street, it’s best not to fall for their game

A stranger spontaneously offers to show you the city for a tiny fee? Exercise caution. According to the author, these people usually do not work for an official tour operator. The price quoted can quickly rise, and the tour may turn into a forced itinerary through shops linked to the fake guide.

The same logic applies to those soliciting donations in tourist hotspots. A young man or woman may appear wearing a T-shirt bearing a charity’s name and ask for a contribution. Before giving anything, the journalist recommends checking that the organization actually exists and complies with charity regulations. If the solicitor persists, it’s better to end the exchange rather than share personal information or pull out your wallet.

On a beach, sunglasses, hat, or drink vendors also know how to stretch the conversation. Saying “maybe later” could be read as a promise to buy. After years of being approached in destinations from Tangier to Tashkent, the author says he found a particularly simple answer: “No”. He advises repeating it to the various questions asked, without trying to justify yourself.

Restaurants that send someone to accost pedestrians in the street also deserve, in his view, to be bypassed. Promises of cheap drinks or “free” entries do not, on their own, guarantee the quality of the establishment.

Finally, a seemingly friendly encounter in a bar may require a bit of restraint. A person who asks a lot of questions about you while remaining very vague about their own life isn’t necessarily up to no good, but it’s better not to share too much personal information. The author notes that this caution can prevent a stranger from taking advantage of a moment of distraction to rummage through your belongings.

Get those who are there to handle problems to intervene

Some behaviors are particularly hard to tolerate when you’re sharing an activity with other travelers. On a safari, for example, some passengers go to great lengths to secure the best spot to photograph the animals. They shove others aside or monopolize viewpoints, to the detriment of the rest of the group. Rather than sparking a quarrel, the journalist recommends alerting the guide. He is responsible for the smooth running of the excursion and has the authority to enforce the rules aboard the vehicle.

The same approach works on a plane. If a passenger is watching a movie on their phone without headphones, it’s best not to demand that they lower the volume directly. A confrontation can escalate quickly, whereas cabin crew are used to these situations and trained to defuse them.

Another trickier case: a police officer asking a tourist for money in exchange for a supposed offense. The author advises staying calm and polite, then offering to pay the official fine at the police station, with the proper documents and in the presence of a supervisor. He also recommends having the contact details of your country’s embassy on your phone. From experience, this request can be enough to deter someone simply looking to obtain money.

Ultimately, these situations share a common thread: the traveler doesn’t necessarily stand to gain from provoking a confrontation. On the street, on a plane, on a safari, or facing someone in a position of authority, staying calm, limiting the information you share, and calling in a professional when possible are the best ways to regain control of the situation.

In the same series “Our Travel Tips”:

This new airport scam could get you arrested abroad

Here are the 3 moves to rely on from flight attendants to travel like a pro

Here are the places and objects in a hotel room that are the dirtiest

To Avoid Dobby’s Grave, a €500 Million Submarine Cable Was Moved

Harry Potter fans had the last word! A 200-kilometer electrical cable is to connect the United Kingdom to Ireland, but its planned route sparked a mobilization that was anything but expected. The issue was its passage planned near Freshwater West, a Welsh beach made famous among fans of the wizard. The project risked crossing the site associated with the tomb of Dobby, the house-elf killed in “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows”. Facing hundreds of reactions, the project leaders ultimately altered their itinerary.

A fictional tomb turned into a pilgrimage site

At Freshwater West, in Pembrokeshire, the memory of Dobby regularly draws fans of the Harry Potter saga. It is on this beach that the scenes of the death and burial of this beloved character were filmed for the movie “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows”. Since then, visitors come to lay pebbles on which they inscribe “Here Lies Dobby”, transforming the place into an improvised memorial. The phenomenon, however, is not encouraged by the National Trust, owner of the site. The organization thus asks visitors not to leave stones on the beach, considered an ecologically sensitive area.

It was in this setting that a large energy project was initially supposed to lay its cable. Named Greenlink, the interconnector is meant to enable the exchange of electricity between the British grid and Ireland. With a cost of 430 million pounds sterling, about 500 million euros, it would connect the British national grid to County Wexford, Ireland, over a distance of roughly 200 kilometers.

The problem became public when Simon Ludlam, the project manager, showed the BBC the spot where the cable would join the underground at Freshwater West. After the broadcast of the report, the company received hundreds of calls. “We did the filming, we finished, I went back to London, and then they aired it a few weeks later. And we received hundreds of calls, literally, hundreds of calls”, Ludlam recounted in the podcast Energy Revolution.

Archaeologists preferred Bronze Age remains

At first, the site supervisor did not understand the reason for this outcry. He then discovered that the calls concerned the character created by J.K. Rowling. A colleague explained to him: “Apparently, we are going to pass directly over Dobby’s tomb.” Simon Ludlam admits to having been puzzled: “Dobby, who is Dobby? I don’t know Dobby.” Before adding: “He’s a fictional character in a fictional book, everything is fictional, what are you talking about?”. But the scale of the reactions eventually convinced the project leaders to rethink their plan. “No, this is very, very serious”, a colleague reportedly told him.

The company therefore asked its planning teams to study another route to spare the place associated with Dobby. “Many people were very happy about that, and the project is moving forward now and Dobby is happy”, explained Simon Ludlam. The new route, however, does not mean the cable will avoid all trace of the past. Quite the opposite: according to the project manager, it will now pass near real Bronze Age archaeological remains. These include, notably, urns linked to human funeral practices.

“Nous sommes finalement passés assez près de véritables vestiges de l’âge du bronze, mais nous avons évité la tombe de Dobby”, a confirmé Simon Ludlam. Le paradoxe n’a pas échappé au responsable du projet : un chantier d’infrastructure de plusieurs centaines de millions de livres a été réorienté pour préserver un lieu associé à un personnage qui n’a jamais existé, tandis que son nouveau parcours se rapproche de sépultures humaines bien réelles…