Passport Without a Given Name: Why This Passenger Was Denied Boarding [ABO]


Passeport sans prénom : pourquoi ce passager a été refusé à l’embarquement -  Depositphotos.com Auteur LP2tudio

CroisiEurope


A passenger filed a complaint with Mediation following a boarding denial on a flight from Paris to the United Arab Emirates, the first leg of a journey aimed at reaching Chennai. He sought reimbursement for the costs incurred to modify his trip, as well as compensation for a service he lost at the destination.

The travelers held a confirmed booking for two successive flights operated by the same airline. They planned to spend four days in the Emirates to celebrate a family event and had even booked a table at a restaurant.

On the day of departure, the passenger’s boarding was refused because the prenom on his passport was “ Xxx ” and his passport contained no other given names, but only a surname.

Forced to adjust his itinerary, the passenger incurred costs to reserve a direct new flight to his final destination. He also had to pay cancellation fees related to the booking made in the Emirates.



What the texts say:

Legally, the airline’s General Conditions of Carriage remind that it is the passenger’s responsibility to verify entry requirements for the countries visited and to ensure the compliance of their travel documents.

Moreover, information published by French authorities indicates that since December 2023, the United Arab Emirates have been denying entry to travelers whose passports contain incomplete or atypical information, notably when entries such as “X” replace a name, a given name, or a date of birth.

UAE authorities’ guidance also confirms that travelers whose passport contains only a surname, with no given name, are not allowed to enter the territory.


What the Tourism and Travel Mediation recommends:

In this context, the boarding denial appears justified, as the passenger did not possess documents that conform to the local authorities’ requirements.

Consequently, the costs incurred to modify the ticket cannot be reimbursed. Similarly, the loss of the restaurant reservation does not constitute compensable harm, as it did not correspond to a damage foreseeable at the time the contract was formed, in accordance with Article 1231-3 of the Civil Code.

In light of these elements, the Tourism and Travel Mediation concluded that there was no legal basis to require the airline to reimburse the claimed sums.


Find all the practical cases of the Tourism and Travel Mediation by clicking HERE.


Thousands of Football Fans Denied U.S. Visas for World Cup

Who is the FIFA World Cup for? The question may seem surprising, yet it appears utterly legitimate just days before the launch of the 23rd edition of this flagship event in world football. This year, the matches will take place across three countries: Mexico, Canada and the United States. Millions of fans typically travel to watch the games in stadiums – in 2022, in Qatar, 3.4 million people attended the matches, according to FIFA. This year, Donald Trump’s immigration policy deprives thousands of people of the event.

BBC journalists gathered testimonies from several football supporters who did not obtain visas to the United States. As the World Cup kickoff on Thursday, June 11, 2026 approaches, thousands are barred from entering American soil. In many cases, it is the visa issuance restrictions set by Donald Trump that are to blame.

Citizens of these countries have no chance of attending the World Cup live

For supporters of the Haiti, Iran, Senegal, and Ivory Coast teams, all represented in this World Cup, a trip to the United States is almost impossible. Since his re-election, Donald Trump has issued travel bans or pushed for a reduction in the number of visas issued to these countries. “It’s a form of segregation that does not name itself,” says Julien Kouadio Adonis, a member of the Ivorian fans’ association.

European fans, meanwhile, will probably have no problem entering the territory. If they are nationals of one of the 42 countries worldwide that have an agreement with Washington to enter the United States without a visa, they only need to pay the 40-dollar ESTA travel authorization. No African country is on this list. And only three Middle Eastern countries are on it: Brunei, Israel and Qatar.

A World Cup among nationals from wealthy countries?

In countries where it is possible to apply for a visa to the United States, the criteria are particularly restrictive. Applicants are usually required to prove they have thousands of euros in their bank accounts and a return ticket to their country of origin. In May, the administration announced that a simple ticket to attend the matches would be enough to apply for a visa — instead of the usual cash deposits. But the announcement arrived far too late to meet the processing times of local embassies, and this despite the FIFA Pass principle, intended to speed up the process.

Finally, some foreign nationals have faced another problem: the absence of U.S. consulates or embassies in their country. Since they must undergo a prior interview to obtain a visa, this lack of diplomatic representation effectively prevents them from setting foot in the United States. This particularly affects Iraqi fans. Washington is usually represented in Baghdad, but it has suspended its consular activities since the beginning of the conflict with Iran, rendering it impossible to grant visas to local football fans. The Iranian team is nonetheless qualified for the competition for the second time in its history and the first time since 1986.

In some cases, foreign supporters can turn to matches held in Canada or Mexico, which are less restrictive. But even there, a portion of visas is refused and the issue of consular representation also arises. And that’s without mentioning the price of tickets for this World Cup. Due to dynamic pricing and resales, prices reach record highs. According to RMC Sport, the current record stands at 17,199 euros for the group-stage match between Spain and Uruguay.